Mr. Teaser I really hope he did not play the under too. Considering I got this at -125 and I can get +145 right now and get money regardless. By the time the season will start I will be able to get +150 or +160, watch and you will see Johnnie. I will keep my bet and post back in December when MIA goes 11-5 or 12-4 or maybe even 13-3.
here's one worth checking out @ Oly:
Redskins under 7', +130. Why? 2nd yr. quarterback in Ramsay w/ only handful of starts under his belt. Spurrier yet to prove himself as h.c. Lead running back, T. Candidate??? D-line with a whole bunch of questions. Sched: 2 gms w/ Philly, also T Bay, Jets, Seattle, Miami, Atlanta. The under seems closer to even money to me, but Oly will give you a nice premium.
Redskins under 7', +130. Why? 2nd yr. quarterback in Ramsay w/ only handful of starts under his belt. Spurrier yet to prove himself as h.c. Lead running back, T. Candidate??? D-line with a whole bunch of questions. Sched: 2 gms w/ Philly, also T Bay, Jets, Seattle, Miami, Atlanta. The under seems closer to even money to me, but Oly will give you a nice premium.
the Chiefs might pose a threat, but they are only one year older than last year, they AREN'T the oldest team in the NFL, at least last year the Chiefs were, and Phillip Buchannon, who started to shine in his first few games at cornerback his rookie season before getting hurt is back from his injury, and they signed Stubblefield to replace Sam Adams. I see no reason why their offense shouldn't perform as well as last year, and that's the unit that other teams feared the most. The AFC West is always a battle, but the Raiders have a good chance to stay on top, IMO.
Plus, last year they had a killer schedule and still won the AFC. This year's schedule looks a bit easier, so far.
If Dolphins stay reasonably healthy, they will win at least 10 IMO. Remember, Ray Lucas' poor play is the only reason they didnt last year, and this year they have a solid backup, and the defense will be even stronger this year, even better than Tampa's I believe.
I agree with you 100% Hache man. Poppin Fresh what kind of crack are you smoking? Lucky to go 500? I will give you +1000 for what ever you want to lay at Under 7.5 right now. Licke Hache man said Lucas lost them 3 games himself and they should have won both of their last games against Minny and NE. So in theory if Fiedler did not go down they could have went 14-2 but they would have won at least 12 games. This year they won't have that problem with Griese at back up and with 4 new pro bowlers on defense they are the best D in the game period. Last year they were #3 overall now with these additions good luck scoring 14 points for a game. Miami has the best back in the game with Ricky and last year was the only year in 7 years that they did not make the playoffs. You are from Miami so there may be some bitterness but don't let that bring out a stupid comment like that. The only moron here is someone who obviously does not know football, look in the mirror Poppin.
I dont want to burst your bubble about Griese, but theres a reason hes not in Denver anymore. They gave him up for Jake Plummer, who isnt exacty been Joe Montana. That should tell you something about Miami's incredible backup. Seau is not a dominant player anymore by the way. Using the excuse of "they should have won" is not a very good excuse at all. I will give them 9-10 wins if Fiedler stays healthy, 8 wins is not out of the question if he does not.
Just remember Dolphin fans that there is a lot of pressure on Wanny this year. Didn't their D play awesome last year? Didn't Ricky have a career year last year? They still couldn't make the playoffs. What happens if Fiedler throws a couple of picks, will they be calling for Griese?
If you take that bet, good luck. I think there are better plays like the Detroit over, and the Indy over.
If you take that bet, good luck. I think there are better plays like the Detroit over, and the Indy over.
